AIDS- acquired immunodeficiency syndrome- was first reported in the United States in 1981 and has since become a major worldwide epidemic.  AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).  By killing or damaging cells of the body’s immune system, HIV progressively destroys the body’s ability to fight infections and certain cancers.  People diagnosed with AIDS may get life-threatening diseases called opportunistic infections, which are caused by microbes such as viruses or bacteria that usually do not make healthy people sick.

 

HIV belongs to a class of viruses called retroviruses.  Retroviruses are ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses, and in order to replicate they must make a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) copy of their RNA.  It is the DNA genes that allow the virus to replicate. 

 

Like all viruses, HIV can replicate only inside cells, commandeering the cells

machinery to reproduce.  However, only HIV and other retroviruses, once inside a cell, use an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to convert their RNA into DNA, which can be incorporated into the host cells’ genes.

 

HIV belongs to a subgroup of retroviruses known as lentiviruses, or “slow” viruses.  The course of infection with these viruses is characterized by a long interval between initial infection and the onset of serious symptoms.

 

More than 830,000 cases of AIDS have been reported in the United States since 1981.  As many as 950,000 Americans may be infected with HIV, one-quarter of whom are unaware of their infection.  The epidemic is growing most rapidly among minority populations and is a leading killer of African-American males ages 25 to 44.  According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AIDS affects nearly seven times more African Americans and three times more Hispanics than whites.

 

On the national level, figures released as of July 6,2004 from the U.N. Report state that, “The numbers are staggering:  Five million people became infected with HIV last year, more people than any previous year.  Nearly 38 million adults and children are living with HIV worldwide.  While Africa continues to be hit hard, Asia has the fastest-growing new epidemic.”

 

The report further states that, “Some $12 billion will be needed by 2005 to effectively fight AIDS in developing countries—but current annual spending is less than half that”.  “By 2007, an estimated $20 billion will be needed.”

 

Facts that came out of the U.N. Report are:

 

·                    The fastest-growing epidemic is in Asia, with 1.1 million new infections in 2003 alone – the most in a single year to date in Asia, which has 60% of the world’s population.

·                    70% of the HIV-infected world population lives in Africa, yet Africa has only 10% of the world’s population.  If current infection rates continue—without access to treatment—60% of today’s 15 year olds in Africa will not reach their 60th birthday.

·                    An estimated 15 million children under age 18 worldwide have lost one or both parents to AIDS, 12 million of them in sub-Saharan Africa.

·                    Of the 10 million young people living with HIV worldwide; 6 million live in sub-Saharan Africa—75% of whom are young women.

 

The term AIDS applies to the most advanced stages of HIV infection.  CDC developed official criteria for the definition of AIDS and is responsible for tracking the spread of AIDS in the United States.

 

CDC’s definition of AIDS includes all HIV-infected people who have fewer than 200 CD4 positive T cells (abbreviated CD4+ T cells) per cubic millimeter of blood (healthy adults usually have CD4 positive T-cell counts of 1,000 or more.).  In addition, the definition includes 26 clinical conditions that affect people with advanced HIV disease.  Most of these conditions are opportunistic infections that generally do not affect healthy people.  In people with AIDS, these infections are often severe and sometimes fatal because the immune system is so ravaged by HIV that the body cannot fight off certain bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, and other microbes.

 

Symptoms of opportunistic infections common in people with AIDS include

*        Coughing and shortness of breath

*        Seizures and lack of coordination

*        Difficult or painful swallowing

*        Mental symptoms such as confusion and forgetfulness

*        Severe and persistent diarrhea

*        Fever

*        Vision loss

*        Nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting

*        Weight loss and extreme fatigue

*        Severe headaches

*        Coma

 

 

A small number of people first infected with HIV ten (10) or more years ago have not developed symptoms of AIDS.  Scientists are trying to determine what factors may account for their lack of progression to AIDS, such as particular characteristics of their immune systems or whether they were infected with a less aggressive strain of virus, or if their genes may protect them from the effects of HIV.  Scientist hope that understanding the body’s natural method of control may lead to ideas for protective HIV vaccines and use of vaccines to prevent the disease from progressing.

 

Infection with HIV has been the only common factor shared by persons with AIDS throughout the world, including homosexual men, transfusion recipients, persons with hemophilia, sex partners of infected persons, children born to infected women, and health care workers who were infected with HIV while on the job, mainly by being stuck with a needle used on an HIV-infected patient.

 

HIV destroys a certain kind of blood cells—CD4+T cells (helper cells)—which are crucial to the normal function of the human immune system.  In fact, loss

of these cells in people with HIV is an extremely powerful predictor of the development of AIDS.  Studies of thousands of people have revealed that most people infected with HIV carry the virus for years before enough damage is done to the immune system for AIDS to develop.  However, recently developed sensitive tests have shown a strong connection between the amount of HIV in the blood and the decline in CD4+T cell numbers and the development of AIDS.  Reducing the amount of virus in the body with anti- HIV drugs can slow this immune destruction.

 

Scientists are constantly discovering more information about HIV and AIDS.  These discoveries help people learn how to stop transmission of the virus and help people infected with HIV to live longer, healthier lives.  One important question to answer is why some people exposed to HIV become infected and others do not.  Scientists believe it is most likely because of how infectious the other person is and how they are exposed.  For example, more that 90 percent of persons who were exposed through an HIV-infected unit of blood became infected.  So we know that blood-to-blood contact is a very efficient way that HIV is spread.  On the other hand, many health care workers are splashed with blood or bloody body fluids and this type or exposure has caused very few occurrences of HIV infection.  Researchers know how HIV is spread and the ways that people can help protect themselves from being exposed to HIV.

 

 

 

 

 

AIDS STATISTICS

 

 

At the end of the December 2002, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported approximately 384,906 persons in the United States living with AIDS.

 

Of these,

·                    46% were in whites,

·                    34% in blacks,

·                    18% in Hispanics,

·                    <    1% in Asians and Pacific Islanders,

·                    and <1% in American Indians and Alaska Natives;

 

Of the 298,248 men (of 13 years or older) who were living with AIDS,

·                    57% were men who had sex with men (MSM),

·                    23% were injecting drug users (IDU),

·                    10% were exposed through heterosexual contact,

·                    8% were both MSM and IDU;

 

Of the 82,764 adult and adolescent women with AIDS,

·                    61% were exposed through heterosexual contact,

·                    36% were exposed through injecting drug use;

 

3893 children were living with AIDS.

 

In June 1981, the first cases of what is now known as AIDS were reported in the United States.  In the 1980’s, there were rapid increases in the number of AIDS cases and deaths of people with AIDS.  Cases peaked with the 1993 expansion of the case definition and then declined.  The most dramatic declines in cases and deaths have occurred since 1996, with the widespread use of antiretroviral therapy.  Persons with AIDS are surviving longer and are contributing to steady increases in the number of people living with AIDS.

 

Through December 2002 there were 517,414 persons reported to the CDC as living with HIV infection or AIDS.  These reports only include persons diagnosed with HIV/AIDS infection in States with integrated HIV/AIDS surveillance systems (30 out of 50 states).  In 1999, CDC estimated that 800,000 to 900,000 persons in the U.S. were living with HIV or AIDS.  The difference in these values is due to several factors, including the fact that:

 

·                    reporting of persons diagnosed with HIV has not yet been implemented in all States and Territories

·                    anonymous tests are excluded from case reports

·                    and many people are unaware of their HIV status.

 

During the 1990’s, the epidemic shifted steadily toward a growing proportion of AIDS cases in blacks and Hispanics and in women, and toward a decreasing proportion in MSM, although this group remains the largest single exposure group.  Blacks and Hispanics, among whom AIDS rates have been markedly higher than among whites, have been disproportionately affected since the early years of epidemic.  In absolute numbers, blacks have outnumbered whites in new AIDS diagnoses and deaths since 1996, and in the number of people living with AIDS since 1998.

 

The proportion of women with AIDS has increased steadily, and the proportion infected heterosexually has also increased, surpassing (in 1994) the proportion infected through injecting drug use.  Midway through the 1990’s, effective therapies became available, and as early as 1996 their effect on decreases in AIDS incidence and on deaths were detected through surveillance at the population level.  As deaths have decreased, AIDS prevalence has steadily increased, a trend that will continue as long as the number of people with a new AIDS diagnosis exceeds the number of people dying each year.

 

During 2002, 162 pediatric AIDS cases were reported; of these, 88% were acquired perinatally.  The number of estimated pediatric AIDS cases diagnosed each year has declined since 1992.  The decline in pediatric AIDS incidence is associated with the implementation of Public Health Service guidelines.  The guidelines include universal counseling and voluntary HIV testing of pregnant women and use of zidovudine by HIV-infected pregnant women and their newborn infants.  Pediatric HIV surveillance will play an important role, helping to gauge the extent to which intensified prevention efforts contribute to reduced transmission.

 

NOTE:  (For more statistical information regarding Race/Ethnicity see the attached HIV/AIDS Surveillance supplemental Report that is published by the Dept of Health and Human Services.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

BEHAVIORS

 

Twenty years after the first report on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the United States, studies of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and sexual behaviors suggest a resurgent HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM).  To determine HIV incidence among young MSM, CDC analyzed data from the Young Men’s Survey (YMS), a study that found a high prevalence of HIV and associated risks among MSM aged 15-22 years sampled in seven U.S. cities.  This report confirms high HIV incidence among these young men.

 

In this report, males were studied from Baltimore, Dallas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Francisco and Seattle.  Eligible men (i.e., local residents aged 15-22 years) were recruited for the survey.  Participants were asked about and tested for HIV; blood specimens were tested anonymously for HIV.  Participants were scheduled to return in 2 weeks for test results, post-test counseling, and service referrals.  Of the 3,449  young MSM tested, 249 were HIV-positive.  Recent risk behaviors associated with high HIV incidence were having greater than or equal to 5 male sex partners during the preceding 6 months, having unprotected anal sex with men, or having injected drugs.

 

Another source for the spread of HIV infection is when the infection spreads easily when people share equipment to use drugs.  Sharing equipment also spreads hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and other serious diseases.

 

Even small amounts of blood on cookers, filters, tourniquets, or in rinse water can be enough to infect another user.  Blood on your hands – even small amounts – can also be dangerous when you help someone else find a vein, steady their arm, or when you pass equipment.

 

For a lot of people, drugs and sex go together.  Drug users might trade sex for drugs.  Some people think that sexual activity is more enjoyable when they are using drugs.  Drug use, including alcohol, increases the chance that people will not protect themselves during sexual activity.  Someone who is trading sex for drugs, might find it difficult to set limits on what they are willing to do.  Anyone using drugs is less likely to remember to use protection, or to even care about it. 

 

In some communities, needle exchange programs provide free, new syringes.  These programs reduce the rate of new HIV infections.

 

Also drug use can lead to missed doses of anti-HIV medications.  This increases the chance of treatment failure and resistance to medications.

Mixing recreational drugs and anti-HIV medications can be dangerous.  Drug interactions can cause serious side effects or dangerous overdoses.

 

 

 

 

 

OPPORTUNISTIC DISEASES

 

People with HIV infection, particularly those with AIDS, are more susceptible to certain microbes.  The resulting infections can cause severe illnesses or even death in people with severely impaired immune systems.  Some infections can be prevented with immunizations, others with specific medications prescribed by HIV care providers.  There are many infections, however, that only the patient can guard against.  Specific methods for avoiding or thwarting these illnesses are listed below.

 

·                    In all cases of life, strict hand washing should be adhered to with everything that the HIV positive patient does.

·                    Take special precautions with handling pets and pet wastes.  Avoid pet scratches and bites.  Avoid all contact with reptiles and with exotic pets.

·                    Food should be prepared properly.  Hot food should be kept hot  and cold food should be kept cold until ready to consume.

·                    Correct and consistent condom use during all sexual acts should be used.

·                    When traveling pay special attention to vaccinations that are needed and make sure that those needed are not something that will interfere with treatment.  Most vaccines for HIV patients will need to be killed vaccines.

 

Symptoms of opportunistic infections common in people with AIDS include:

·                    Coughing and shortness of breath.

·                    Seizures and lack of coordination.

·                    Difficult or painful swallowing.

·                    Mental symptoms such as confusion and forgetfulness.

·                    Severe and persistent diarrhea.

·                    Fever.

·                    Vision loss.

·                    Nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting.

·                    Weight loss and extreme fatigue.

·                    Severe headache.

·                    Coma

 

 

Examples of opportunistic infections include:

 

Bacterial

Mycobacterium avium complex

Tuberculosis

Salmonellosis

 

Fungal

Candidiasis

Cryptococcus

Histoplasmosis

 

Viral

Cytomegalovirus

Herpes

Hepatitis

Epstein Barr

Genital wart

Molluscum

 

Pneumonia

Bacterial

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia

 

Parasitic

Toxoplasmosis

Cryptosporidium

Isoporiasis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TESTING

 

From MMWR Weekly, On June 27, 2004, there would be National HIV Testing Day.  This annual event is sponsored by the National Association of People with AIDS to encourage persons at risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection to get tested and learn their status.  This year’s theme, “It’s Better to Know,” underscores the importance of being tested for HIV.  An estimated 850,000 – 950,000 persons in the United States are HIV positive, and an estimated one in four are not aware of their infection.  Persons who know they are infected can benefit from advances in medical care that can prolong their lives, and they can take action to prevent transmission to others.

 

HIV testing has become easier, more accessible, and less invasive in 2004.  One antibody test can provide preliminary results in as little as 20 minutes and can be used in both medical and nonclinical settings.  A new oral version of that test approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April, will make getting tested even easier by eliminating the need for a finger-stick blood sample.

 

Questions and Answers about testing:

 

·                    What is an HIV antibody test?

A.    When HIV enters the body, it begins to attack certain white blood cells called T4 lymphocyte cells (helper cells).  Your doctor may also call them CD4 cells.  The immune system then produces antibodies to fight off the infection.  Although these antibodies are ineffective in destroying HIV, their presence is used to confirm HIV infection.  Therefore, the presence of antibodies to HIV result from HIV infection.  HIV tests look for the presence of HIV antibodies; they do not test for the virus itself.

·                    What blood tests detect the presence of HIV?

A.    HIV testing consists of an initial screening with two types of tests commonly used to detect HIV infection.  The most commonly used initial test is an enzyme immune assay (EIA) or the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).  If EIA test results show a reaction, the test is repeated on the same blood sample.  If the sample is repeatedly the same result or either duplicate test is reactive the results are “confirmed”  using a second test such as the Western Blot.  This more specific (and more expensive) test can tell the difference between HIV antibodies and other antibodies that can react to the EIA and cause false positive results.  False positive EIA results are uncommon, but can occur.  A person is considered infected following a repeatedly reactive result from the EIA, confirmed by the Western Blot test.

·                    What about home test kits?

A.    Home test kits can be purchased in most pharmacies and via the Internet and involve no actual testing of the blood by the person using the kit.  The only “at-home” components of the testing process involve the collection of a small sample of blood using a finger stick and the receipt of the results over the phone.  First, the blood sample is mailed to the manufacturer for a standard EPA test.  The consumer must call a phone number several days later to receive the results and be offered the choice of speaking to a trained counselor.  A positive result must be confirmed with a blood-based Western Blot (which cannot be done with a home-based test kit).

 

WHO Should Get Tested?

 

·                    Have you injected drugs or steroids or shared equipment (such as needles, syringes, cotton, water) with others?

·                    Have you had unprotected vaginal, anal, or oral sex with men who have sex with men, multiple partners, or anonymous partners?

·                    Have you exchanged sex for drugs or money?

·                    Have you been diagnosed with or treated for hepatitis, tuberculosis (TB), or a sexually transmitted disease (STD), like syphilis?

·                    Have you received a blood transfusion or clotting factor between 1978 and 1985?

·                    Have you had unprotected sex with someone who would answer yes to any of the above questions?

 

 

 

WHERE Can a Person Get Tested?

·                    Local health departments.

·                    Private doctor’s offices.

·                    Hospitals

·                    Clinics

Information:

1-800-342-AIDS

1-800-AIDS-TTY (TTY)

1-800-344-SIDA (Spanish)

 

If you test positive:         SEE A PHYSICIAN!  Immediate treatment and a healthy lifestyle can help you stay well.

If your test is negative:  It does not mean that the person or people that you have engaged in risky behavior with are also negative.  HIV is not necessarily transmitted every time there is an exposure.

 

The HIV antibody test has limitations. Antibodies usually appear within 3 to 6 months after exposure to and subsequent infection with HIV.  Because an infected person does not develop antibodies immediately, a negative result cannot rule out recent HIV infection.  If recent exposure is suspected, the test must be repeated in 6 months.

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSMISSION

 

Some means of transmission have been previously discussed.  In addition to this scientists and medical authorities agree that HIV does not survive well in the environment, making the possibility of environmental transmission remote.  HIV is found in varying concentrations or amounts in blood, semen, vaginal fluid, breast milk, saliva and tears.  To obtain data on survival of HIV, laboratory studies have required the use of artificially high concentrations of laboratory-grown virus.  Although these unnatural concentrations of HIV can be kept alive for days or even weeks under precisely controlled and limited laboratory conditions, CDC studies have shown that drying of even these high concentrations of HIV reduces the amount of infectious virus by 90 to 99 percent within several hours.  Since the HIV concentrations used in laboratory studies are much higher than those actually found in blood or other specimens, drying of HIV-infected human blood or other body fluids reduces the theoretical risk of environmental transmission to that which has been observed—essentially unnecessarily alarmed some people.

 

Among adults, HIV is spread most commonly during sexual intercourse with an infected partner.  During sex, the virus can enter the body through the mucosal linings of the vagina, vulva, penis, or rectum after intercourse or, rarely, via the mouth and possibly the upper gastrointestinal tract after oral sex.  The likelihood of transmission is increased by factors that may damage these linings, especially other sexually transmitted diseases that cause ulcers or inflammation.

 

Research suggests that immune system cells of the dendrite cell type, which reside in the mucosa, may begin the infection process after sexual exposure by binding to and carrying the virus from the site of infection to the lymph nodes where other immune system cells become infected.

 

HIV can also be transmitted by contact with infected blood, most often by sharing of needles or syringes contaminated with minute quantities of blood containing the virus.  The risk of acquiring HIV from blood transfusion is now extremely small in the United States, as all blood products in this country are screened routinely for evidence of the virus.

 

Kissing:        Casual contact through closed-mouth or “social” kissing is not a risk for transmission of HIV.  Because of the potential for contact with blood during “French” or open-mouth kissing, CDC recommends against engaging in this activity with a person known to be infected.  However, the risk of acquiring HIV during open-mouth kissing is believed to be very low.  CDC has investigated only one case of HIV infection that may be attributed to contact with blood during open-mouth kissing.

 

Biting:          In 1997, CDC published findings from a state health department investigation of an incident that suggested blood-to-blood transmission of HIV by a human bite.  There have been other reports in the medical literature in which HIV appeared to have been transmitted by a bite.  Severe trauma with extensive tissue tearing and damage and presence of blood were reported in each of these instances.  Biting is not a common way of transmitting HIV.  In fact, there are numerous reports of bites that did not result in HIV infection.

 

Insects:       From the onset of the HIV epidemic, there has been concern about transmission of the virus by biting and blood sucking insects.  However, studies conducted by researchers at CDC and elsewhere have shown no evidence of HIV transmission through insects—even in areas where there are many cases of AIDS and large populations of insects such as mosquitoes.  Lack of such outbreaks, despite intense efforts to detect them, supports the conclusion that HIV is not transmitted by insects.

 

                                     

 

 

 

 

PREVENTION

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new initiative, Advancing HIV Prevention: New Strategies for a Changing Epidemic, is aimed at reducing barriers to early diagnosis of HIV infection and, if positive, increasing access to quality medical care, treatment, and ongoing prevention services.  The initiative emphasizes the use of proven public health approaches to reduce the incidence and spread of disease.  As with other sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s) or any other public health concern, principles applied to prevent disease and its spread will be used, including appropriate routine screening, identification of new cases, partner counseling and referral services, and increased availability of sustained treatment and prevention services for those infected.

 

CDC’s HIV prevention activities over the past two decades have focused on helping uninfected persons at high risk for HIV change and maintain behaviors to keep them uninfected.  Despite these efforts, the number of new HIV infections is estimated to have remained stable and the number of persons living with HIV continues to increase.

 

The new initiative capitalizes on new rapid test technologies, interventions that bring persons unaware of their HIV status to HIV testing, and behavioral interventions that provide preventions skills to persons living with HIV.

 

The next decade promises new hope as three primary areas of HIV prevention are emphasized:

·                    Early detection of persons who are HIV positive and referral to care services.

·                    Prevention interventions with persons living with HIV.

·                    Prevention with person who are at high risk for HIV infection.

The initiative consists of four key strategies:

·                    Make HIV testing a routine part of medical care.

·                    Implement new models for diagnosing HIV infections outside medical settings.

·                    Prevent new infections by working with persons diagnosed with HIV and their partners.

·                    Further decrease perinatal HIV transmission.

 

This initiative, which was started in FY 2003 comes with a $35 million allocation to help fund the project.

The initiative allows for consultations with constituents, grantees, and community groups.  It allows for more training for those doing testing and for reduced rates on kits to do the testing.

 

To prevent exposures to the blood of persons who are HIV infected, at risk for HIV infection, or whose infections and risk status are unknown, the following should be considered:

·                    Gloves should be worn during contact with blood or other body fluids that could possibly contain visible blood, such as urine, feces or vomit.

·                    Cuts, sores, or breaks on both the care givers’ and patients’ exposed skin should be covered with bandages.

·                    Hands and other parts of the body should be washed immediately after contact with blood or other body fluids, and surfaces soiled with blood should be disinfected appropriately.

·                    Practices that increase the likelihood of blood contact, such as sharing of razors and toothbrushes should be avoided.

·                    Needles and other sharp instruments should be used only when medically necessary and handled accordingly to recommendations for health-care settings. (Do not put caps back on needles by hand or remove from syringes.  Dispose of needles in puncture-proof containers).

 

Condoms are classified as medical devices and are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  Condom manufacturers in the United States test each latex condom for defects, including holes, before it is packaged.  The proper and consistent use of latex or polyurethane ( a type of plastic) condoms when engaging in sexual intercourse—vaginal, anal or oral—can greatly reduce a person’s risk of acquiring or transmitting sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV infection.

 

There are many different types and brands of condoms available—however, only latex or polyurethane condoms provide a highly effective mechanical barrier to HIV.  In laboratories viruses occasionally have been shown to pass through natural membrane (“skin” or lambskin) condoms, which may contain natural pores and are therefore not recommended for disease prevention (they are documented to be effective for contraception).  Women may wish to consider using the female condom when a male condom cannot be used.

 

For condoms to provide maximum protection, they must be used consistently (every time) and correctly.  Several studies of correct and consistent condom use clearly show that latex condom breakage rates in this country are less than 2 percent.

 

When condoms are used reliably, they have been shown to prevent pregnancy up to 98 percent of the time among couples using them as their method of contraception.  Similarly, numerous studies among sexually active people have demonstrated that a properly used latex condom provides a high degree of protection against a variety of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV infection.

 

The CDC recommends that people who inject drugs should be regularly counseled to:

·                    Stop using and injecting drugs.

·                    Enter and complete substance abuse treatment, including relapse prevention.

For injecting drug users who cannot or will not stop injecting drugs, the following steps may be taken to reduce personal and public health risks:

·                    Never reuse or “share” syringes, water or drug preparation equipment.

·                    Only use syringes obtained from a reliable source (such as pharmacies or needle exchange programs).

·                    Use a new, sterile syringe each time to prepare and inject drugs.

·                    If possible, use sterile water to prepare drugs; otherwise, use clean water from a reliable source (such as fresh tap water).

·                    Use a new or disinfected container (“cooker”) and a new filter (“cotton”) to prepare drugs.

·                    Clean the injection site with a new alcohol swab prior to injection.

·                    Safely dispose of syringes after one use.

 

If new, sterile syringes and other drug preparation and injection equipment are not available, then previously used equipment should be boiled in water or disinfected with bleach before reuse.

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERINATAL TRANSMISSION

 

The chance that HIV infection is transmitted from a mother who is HIV infected to her child during pregnancy can be reduced to 2 percent or less (fewer) than 2 out of every 100).  This is possible because of better medicines available to treat HIV.  But first, the pregnant woman and her doctor must know if she is infected with HIV.

 

OFFERING RAPID TESTING AT DELIVERY TO LATE PRESENTING WOMEN:

One of the groups at high risk for transmitting HIV-1 to their infants are those women who have not received antenatal care and were not offered HIV-1 counseling and testing.  The feasibility of offering counseling and rapid HIV-1 testing to women of unknown HIV-1 status who present while in labor requires further study.  Additionally, the efficacy and acceptability of intrapartum/postpartum or postpartum infant interventions to reduce the risk of intrapartum transmission by women first identified as infected with HIV-1 during delivery needs to be assessed.

 

Many pregnant women with HIV-1 infection in the United States are receiving combination antiretroviral therapy for their own health care along with standard ZDV prophylaxis to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission.  Additionally, recent date indicate that antenatal use of potent antiretroviral combinations capable of reducing plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number to very low or undetectable levels near the time of delivery may lower the risk of perinatal transmission to < 2%.

 

To prevent P. carinii, all infants born to women with HIV-1 infection should begin prophylaxis at age 6 weeks, after completion of the ZDV prophylaxis regimen.  Monitoring and diagnostic evaluation of HIV-1 exposed infants should follow current standards of care.  Data do not indicated any delay inHIV-1 diagnosis in infants who have received the ZDV regimen.  However, the effect of combination antiretroviral therapy in the mother or newborn on the sensitivity of infant virologic diagnostic testing is unknown.  Infants with negative virologic test results during the first 6 weeks of like should have diagnostic evaluation repeated after completion of the neonatal antiretroviral prophylaxis regimen.

 

 

Opt-in:

·                    Pregnant women are given pre-HIV test counseling.

·                    They must agree to get an HIV test, usually in writing.

Opt-out:

·                    Pregnant women are told that an HIV test will be included in the standard group of prenatal tests (that is to say, tests given to all pregnant women), and that they may decline the test.

·                    Unless they decline, they will receive an HIV test.

 

 

 

 

WHAT DOES THE CDC RECOMMENT?

CDC recommends the opt-out approach, which would make the HIV test a part of the group of tests that all pregnant women receive routinely .  Studies show that the opt-out approach can

·                    Increase testing rates among pregnant women,

·                    Increase the number of HIV-infected women who are offered treatment, and

·                    Reduce HIV transmission to their babies during birth.

 

Several lessons have been learned from the evaluation of the study that was completed in 1995 by PHS.  Many women, especially those who used illicit drugs, were not tested for HIV during pregnancy because of lack of prenatal care.  In additions, many women refused testing because their health-care providers did not strongly recommend it.  Some women declined testing because of perceived low risk, and some providers failed to offer testing because of perceived low risk, perceived difficulties and complexity of required counseling, and misunderstanding of counseling requirements.  The logistics of testing, if too complex, also were considered a potential barrier to testing.

 

Maximum reduction of perinatal transmission depends on preventing HIV infection in women or identifying HIV infection before pregnancy or as early as possible during pregnancy.  Diagnosis allows a woman to receive effective antiretroviral therapies for her own health and preventive drugs (e.g., ZDV) to improve the chances that her infant will be born free of infection.  Early knowledge of maternal HIV status is also important for decisions regarding obstetrical management.  Achieving these goals requires increased access to and use of prenatal care.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TREATMENT

 

Class  /Generic Name  /                      Brand and Other 

                                                                   Names                                           

 

Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)

 

          Delavirdine                               Rescriptor,DLV   Pfizer            

          Efavirenz                                  Sustiva, EFV       

                                               

          Nevirapine                                Viramune, NVP

                                                               

 

Necleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs)

         

Abacavir                                   Ziagen, ABC

Abacair, Lamivudine, Zidovudine Trizivir

          Didanosine                                Videx, ddl

                                                          Videx EC

          Emtricitabine                            Emtriva, FTC

                                                          Coviracil

          Lamivudine                                Epivir, 3TC

          Lamivudine,Zidovudine               Combivir

          Stavudine                                  Zerit, d4T

          Tenofovir DF                            Viread, TDF

          Zalcitabine                               Hivid, ddC

          Zidovudine                                Retrovir, AZT, ZDV

 

Protease Inhibitors (PIs)

 

          Amprenavir                               Agenerase, APV

          Atazanavir                                Reyataz, ATV

          Fosamprenavir                           Lexiva, FPV

          Indinavir                                  Crixivan, IDV

          Lopinavir, Ritonavir                             Kaletra, LPV/r

          Nelfinavir                                 Viracept, NFV

          Ritonavir                                  Norvir, RTV

          Saquinavir                                 Fortovase, SQV, Invirase

Fusion Inhibitors

         

          Enfuvirtide                               Fuzeon, T-20

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OSHA BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS STANDARDS

 

 

1910.1030(c)(1)(i)

Each employer having an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure.

 

1910.1030(c)(1)(iii)

Each employer shall ensure that a copy of the Exposure Control Plan is accessible to employees in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020(e).

 

1910.1030 (c)(1)(iv)

The Exposure Control Plan shall be reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure.  The review and update of such plans shall also:

 

 

1910.1030.(d)(1)

General.  Universal precautions shall be observed to prevent contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials.  Under circumstances in which differentiation between body fluid types is difficult or impossible, all body fluids shall be considered potentially infectious materials.

 

1910.1030(d)(2)(iv)

When provision of hand washing facilities is not feasible, the employer shall provide either an appropriate antiseptic hand cleanser in conjunction with clean cloth/paper towels or antiseptic towelettes.  When antiseptic hand cleansers or towelettes are used, hands shall be washed with soap and running water as soon as feasible.

 

 

1910.1030(d)(2)(vi)

Employers shall ensure that employees wash hands and any other skin with soap and water and flush mucous membranes with water immediately or as soon as feasible following contact of such body areas with blood or other potentially infectious materials.

 

1910.1030(d)(2)(vii)

Contaminated needles and other contaminated sharps shall not be bent, recapped, or removed except as noted in paragraphs (d)(2)(vii)(A) and (d)(2)(vii)(B) below.  Shearing or breaking of contaminated needles is prohibited.

 

Personal Protective Equipment-

 

1910.1030(d) (3) (i)

Provision.  When there is occupational exposure, the employer shall provide, at no cost to the employee, appropriate personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, gloves, gowns, laboratory coats, face shields or masks and eye protection, and mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, pocket masks, or other ventilation devices.  Personal protective equipment will be considered “appropriate” only if it does not permit blood or other potentially infectious materials to pass through to or reach the employee’s work clothes, street clothes, undergarments, skin, eyes, mouth, or other mucous membranes under normal conditions of use and for the duration of time which the protective equipment will be used.

 

1910.1030(d) (3) (ii)

USE.  The employee shall ensure that the employee uses appropriate personal protective equipment unless the employer shows that the employee temporarily and briefly declined to use personal protective equipment when, under rare extraordinary circumstances, it was the employee’s professional judgment that in the specific instance its use would have prevented the delivery of health care or public safety services or would have posed an increased hazard to the safety of the worker or co-worker.  When the employee makes this judgment, the circumstances shall be investigated and documented in order to determine whether changes can be instituted to prevent such occurrences in the future.

 

1910.1030(d) (3) (iii)

Accessibility.  The employer shall ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment in the appropriate sizes is readily accessible at the worksite or is issued to employees.  Hypoallergenic gloves, glove liners, powderless gloves, or other similar alternatives shall be readily accessible to those employees who are allergic to gloves normally provided.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIV POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS

 

Antiretroviral agents from three classes of drugs are available for the treatment of HIV infection.  These agents include the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleioside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PIs).  Only antiretroviral agents that have been approved by FDA for treatment of HIV infections are discussed in these guidelines.

 

Determining which agents and how many to use or when to alter a PEP regimen is largely empiric.  Guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection, a condition usually involving a high total body burden of HIV, include recommendations for the use of three drugs; however, the applicability of these recommendations to PEP remains unknown.  In HIV-infected patients, combination regimens have proved superior to monotherapy regimens in reducing HIV viral load, reducing the incidence of opportunistic infections and death, and delaying onset of drug resistance.  A combination of drugs with activity at different stages in the viral replication cycle (e.g., nucleoside analogues with a PI) theoretically could offer an additional preventative effect in PEP, particularly for occupational exposures that pose an increased risk of transmission.  Although the use of a three-drug regimen might be justified for exposures that pose an increased risk of transmission, whether the potential added toxicity of a third drug is justified for lower-risk exposures is uncertain.  Therefore, the recommendations at the end of this document provide guidance for two- and three-drug PEP regimens that are based on the level of risk for HIV transmission represented by the exposure.

 

 

 

BASIC AND EXPANDED HIV POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS REGIMENS

 

Basic Regimen

·                    Zidovudine (RETROVIR™; ZDV; AZT) + Lamivudine (EPIVIR™; 3TC); available as COMBIVIR™

--ZDV: 600 mg per day, in two or three divided doses, and

--3TC: 150 mg twice daily.

Alternate Basic Regimens

·                    Lamivudine (3TC) + Stavudine (ZERIT™; d4T)

--3TC:  150 mg twice daily, and

--d4T: 40 mg (if body weight is < 60 kg, 30 mg twice daily) twice daily.

·                    Didanosine (VIDEX™, chewable/dispersable buffered tablet; VIDEX™ EC, delayed-release capsule: ddl) + Stavudine (d4T)

--ddl: 400 mg (if body weight is < 60kg, 125 mg twice daily) daily, on an empty stomach.

--d4T: 40 mg (if body weight is < 60 kg, 30 mg twice daily) twice daily.

Expanded Regimen

·                    Indinavir (CRIXIVAN™; IDV)

--800 mg every 8 hours, on an empty stomach.

·                    Nelfinavir (VIRACEPT™; NFV)

--750 mg three times daily, with meals or snack, or

--1250 mg twice daily, with meals or snack.

·                    Efavirenz (SUSTIVA™; EFV)

--600 mg daily, at bedtime.

·                    Abacavir (ZIAGEN™; ABC); available as TRIZIVIR™, a combination of ZDV, 3TC, and ABC

--300 mg twice daily.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSENT TO TEST

 

 

214.625                  Legislative findings – Consent for medical procedures and tests including HIV infection – Physician’s responsibility – Confidentiality of results – Exceptions – Disclosure – Network of voluntary HIV testing programs.

(1)               The General Assembly finds that the use of tests designed to reveal a condition indicative of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection can be a valuable tool in protecting the public health.  The General Assembly finds that despite current scientific knowledge that zidovudine (AZT) prolongs the lives of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome victims, and may also be effective when introduced in the early stages of human immunodeficiency virus infection, many members of the public are deterred from seeking testing because they misunderstand the nature of the test or fear that test results will be disclosed without consent.  The General Assembly finds that the public health will be served by facilitating informed, voluntary, and confidential use of tests designated to detect human immunodeficiency virus infection.

(2)             A person who has signed a general consent form for the performance of medical procedures and tests is not required to also sign or be presented with a specific consent form relating to medical procedures or tests to determine human immunodeficiency virus infection, antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, or infection with any other causative agent of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome that will be performed on the person during the time in which the general consent form is in effect.  However, a general consent form shall instruct the patient that, as part of the medical procedures or tests, the patient may be tested for human immunodeficiency virus infection, hepatitis or any other blood-borne infectious disease if a doctor orders the test for diagnostic purposes.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection (5)(c) of this section, the results of a test or procedure to determine human immunodeficiency virus infection, antibodies to human immunodeficiency syndrome performed under the authorization of a general consent form shall be sued only for diagnostic or other purposes directly related to medical treatment.

(3)             In an emergency situation where informed consent of the patient cannot reasonably be obtained before providing health-care services, there is no requirement that health-care provider obtain a previous informed consent.

(4)             The physician who orders the test pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section, or the attending physician, shall be responsible for informing the patient of the results of the test if the test results are positive for human immunodeficiency virus infection.  If the tests are positive, the physician shall also be responsible for either:

(a)              Providing information and counseling to the patient concerning his infection or diagnosis and the known medical implications of such status or condition; or

(b)             Referring the patient to another appropriate professional or health-care facility for the information and counseling.

(5)     (a)      No person in this state shall perform a test designed to identify the human immunodeficiency virus, or its antigen or antibody, without first obtaining the informed consent of the person upon whom the test is being performed, except as specified in subsections (2) and (3) of this section.

          (b)     NO test result shall be determined as positive, and no positive test result shall be revealed to any person, without corroborating or confirmatory tests being conducted.

          (c)      No person who has obtained or has knowledge of a test result pursuant to this section shall disclose or be compelled to disclose the identity of any person upon whom a test is performed, or the results of the test in a manner which permits identification of the subject of the test, except to the following persons:

1.       The subject of the test or the subject’s legally authorized representative;

2.     Any person designated in a legally effective release of the test results executed prior to or after the test by the subject of the test of the subject’s legally authorized representative;

3.     A physician, nurse, or other health-care personnel who has a legitimate need to know the test result in order to provide for his protection and to provide for the patient’s health and welfare:

4.     Health-care providers consulting between themselves or with health-care facilities to determine diagnosis and treatment;

5.     The cabinet, in accordance with rules for reporting and controlling the spread of disease, as otherwise provided by state law;

6.     A health facility or health-care provider which procures, processes, distributes or uses:

a.            A human body part from a deceased person, with respect to medical information regarding that person; or

b.           Semen provided prior to July 13, 1990, for the purpose of artificial insemination;

7.     Health facility staff committees, for the purposes of conducting program monitoring, program evaluation, or service reviews;

8.     Authorized medical or epidemiological researchers who shall not further disclose any identifying characteristics or information;

9.     A parent, foster parent, or legal guardian of a minor; a crime victim; or a person specified in KRS 438.250;

10.  A person allowed access by a court order which is issued in compliance with the following provisions:

a.            No court of this state shall issue an order to permit access to a test for human immunodeficiency virus performed in a medical or public health setting to any person not authorized by this section or by KRS 214.420.  A court may order an individual to be tested for human immunodeficiency virus only if the person seeking the test results has demonstrated a compelling need for the test results which cannot be accommodated by other means.  In assessing compelling need, the court shall weight the need for testing and disclosure against the privacy interest of the test subject and the public interest which may be disserved by disclosure which deters blood, organ and semen donation and future human immunodeficiency virus-related testing or which may lead to discrimination.  This paragraph shall not apply to blood bank donor records;

b.           Pleadings pertaining to disclosure of tests results shall substitute a pseudonym for the true name of the subject of the test.  The disclosure to the parties of the subject’s true name shall be communicated confidentially, in documents not filed with the court;

c.            Before granting any order, the court shall provide the individual whose test result is in question with notice and a reasonable opportunity to participate in the proceedings if he is not already a party;

d.            Court proceedings as to disclosure of test results shall be conducted in camera, unless the subject of the test agrees to a hearing in open court or unless the court determines that a public hearing is necessary to the public interest and the proper administration of justice; and

e.            Upon the issuance of an order to disclose test results, the court shall impose appropriate safeguards against unauthorized disclosure, which shall specify the persons who may have access to the information, the purposes for which the information shall be used, and appropriate prohibitions on future disclosure.

No person to whom the results of a test have been disclosed shall disclose the test results to another person except as authorized by this subsection.  When disclosure is made pursuant to this subsection, it shall be accompanied by a statement in writing which includes the following or substantially similar language: “This information has been disclosed to you from records whose confidentiality is protected by state law.  State law prohibits you from making any further disclosure of such information without the specific written consent of the person to whom such information pertains, or is otherwise permitted by state law.  A general authorization for the release of medical or other information is NOT sufficient for this purpose.”  An oral disclosure shall be accompanied by oral notice and followed by a written notice within ten (10) days.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY ISSUES

 

214.645                  Reporting system of HIV-positive persons – Confidentiality and reporting requirements – Reporting system surveillance, assessment and restrictions.

(1)               The Cabinet for Health Services shall establish a system for reporting, by the use of a unique code, of all persons who test positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.  The reporting shall include the date including, but not limited to, CD4 count and viral load, and other information that are necessary to comply with the confidentiality and reporting requirements of the most recent edition of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Guidelines for National Human Immunodeficiency Virus Case Surveillance.  As recommended by the CDC, anonymous testing shall remain as an alternative.  If less restrictive date identifying requirement are identified by the CDC, the cabinet shall evaluate the new requirements for implementation.

(2)             The reporting system established under subsection (1) of this section shall:

(a.)            Use a unique code that consists of any combination of initials, the last four (4) numbers of the Social Security number, birth date, or other information to be determined by the cabinet;

(b.)           Attempt to identify all modes of HIV transmission, unusual clinical or virologic manifestations, and other cases of public health importance;

(c.)            Require collection of the unique code and date from all private and public sources of HIV-related testing and care services: and

(d.)            Use reporting methods that match the CDC’s standards for completeness, timeliness, and accuracy, and follow up, as necessary, with the health care provider making the report to verify completeness, timeliness and accuracy.

(3)     Authorized surveillance staff designated by the cabinet shall:

(b.)           Match the information from the reporting system  to other public health databases, wherever possible, to limit duplication and to better quantify the extent of HIV infection in the Commonwealth;

(c.)            Conduct a biennial assessment of the HIV and AIDS reporting systems, insure that the assessment is available for review by the public and any state or federal agency, and forward a copy of the assessment to the Legislative Research Commission and the Interim Joint Committee of Health and Welfare;

(d.)            Document the security policies and procedures and insure their availability for review by the public or any state or federal agency;

(e.)            Minimize storage and retention of unnecessary paper or electronic reports and insure that related policies are consistent with CDC technical guidelines;

(f.)            Assure that electronic transfer of data is protected by encryption during transfer;

(g.)            Provide that records be stored in a physically secluded area and protected by coded passwords and computer encryption;

(h.)            Restrict access to data a minimum number of authorized surveillance staff who are designated by a responsible authorizing official, who have been trained in confidentiality procedures, and who are aware of penalties for unauthorized disclosure of surveillance information;

(i.)              Require that any other public health program that receives data has appropriate security and confidentiality protections and penalties;

(j.)             Restrict use of data, from which identifying information has been removed, to cabinet-approved research, and require all persons with this use to sign confidentiality statements;

(k.)            Prohibit release of any unique codes or any other identifying information that may have been received in a report to any person or organization, whether public or private, except in compliance with federal law or consultations with other state surveillance programs and reporting sources.  Under no circumstances shall a unique code or any identifying information be reported to the CDC; and

(l.)              Immediately investigate any report of breach of reporting, surveillance, or confidentiality policy, report the breach to the CDC, develop recommendations for improvements in security measure, and take appropriate disciplinary action for any documented breach.

 

 

 

RYAN WHITE CARE ACT

 

 

The Ryan White CARE (Comprehensive AIDS Resource Emergency) Act was originally signed August 18, 1990, as a federal program designed to improve the quality and availability of care for persons with HIV/AIDS and their families.  The Act was amended and reauthorized in May 1996 with four years of funding at levels determined annually as part of the federal budget process.  The Program is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) which is within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

 

There are four Titles and Part F of the Ryan White Care Act.  The titles are administered by the HIV/AIDS Bureau of HRSA.  Care funds cannot offset state and local expenditures including Medicaid.

 

 

 

 

CULTURAL SENSITIVITY

 

 

There is a report compiled by The Horizons Program from Tulane University, titled Interventions to Reduce HIV/AIDS Stigma:  What Have We Learned?

In this report the writer addresses the Silence and denial that may be the most pervasive reactions to the stigma.  This is signified by the title of the last year’s International AIDS Conference:  Breaking the Silence.  Through research the writer finds that not knowing one’s HIV serostatus is far preferable to being tested.  The fear is that the lack of confidentiality, which is highly likely in many settings, forces disclosure and that individuals can then face prejudice, discrimination, the loss of a job, strains on or the breakup of relationships, social ostracism, or violence.  In underdeveloped countries there is a doom of,   “Why should I go and get tested when I know for a fact I won’t be able to get the necessary treatment?”

 

In this study first, while it may be unrealistic to think that we can eliminate stigma altogether, the studies reviewed here show that we can do something about stigma and that it can be reduced through a variety of intervention strategies (including information, counseling, coping skills acquisition, and contact).  Among studies with a control or comparison group that received information alone (basic intervention), adding another intervention strategy such as counseling or coping skill acquisition was effective in changing attitudes and behaviors.

 

In sub-Saharan Africa, where many of the people in the community are at risk, interventions were aimed at the total population, where in the United State, interventions were aimed at individuals infected with HIV/AIDS. 

 

Flaws with this study are in the fact that there was only a short term study of the after effects, showing not much change in attitudes.  Future recommendations point to continued interventions with more long term goals, involving a larger population instead of the short term effect.

 

One of the most significant problems in dealing with the stigma of HIV/AIDS is that the population of people that are being dealt with for the most part are a population that are looked down upon anyway.  A large population of people infected with HIV/AIDS are “MSM’s”, prostitutes and drug abusers, therefore they are shunned by the public before you get to the topic of disease.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER KENTUCKY LAWS

 

 

529.90          Person convicted required to submit to screening for HIV infection- Prostitution or procuring prostitution with knowledge of sexually transmitted disease or HIV.

(2)             Any person convicted of prostitution or procuring another to commit prostitution under the provisions of KRS 529.020 shall be required to undergo screening for human immunodeficiency virus infection under direction of the Cabinet for Health Services and, if infected, shall submit to treatment and counseling as a condition of release from probation, community control, or incarceration.  Notwithstanding the provisions of KRS 214.420, the results of any test conducted pursuant to this subsection shall be available by the Cabinet for Health Services to medical personnel, appropriate state agencies, or courts of appropriate jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this chapter.

 

 

207.250      Disclosure of HIV information in real estate transaction prohibited.

(1)               The fact that an occupant of real property is infected or has been infected with human immunodeficiency virus or diagnosed with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is not a material fact that shall be disclosed in a real estate transaction.

(2)             No cause of action shall arise against an owner of real property or his agent, or any agent of a transferee of real property for the failure to disclose to the transferee that an occupant of that property was infected with human immunodeficiency virus or diagnosed with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

207.135       Protections available to persons with HIV-Employment discrimination prohibited.

(1)               Any person with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related complex, or human immunodeficiency virus shall have every protection made available to individuals with disabilities under KRS 207.130 to 207.240 and Section 504, Public Law No. 93-112, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, State and local government, public accommodations, commercial facilities, transportation, and telecommunications. It also applies to the United States Congress.

To be protected by the ADA, one must have a disability or have a relationship or association with an individual with a disability. An individual with a disability is defined by the ADA as a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a person who has a history or record of such an impairment, or a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment. The ADA does not specifically name all of the impairments that are covered.

214.610                   Educational course to be completed by health-care workers 

and social workers- Approval by licensing board or certifying entity-Publication of courses.

   (1)           (a)      The Cabinet for Health Services or the licensing board or

certifying entity, subject to the board’s or entity’s discretion, shall approve appropriate educational courses on the transmission, control, treatment, and prevention of the human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, that may address appropriate behavior and attitude change, to be completed as specified in the respective chapters by each person licensed or certified under KRS Chapters 311, 311A, 312, 313, 314, 315, 320, 327, 333, and 335.  Each licensing board or certifying entity shall have the authority to determine whether it shall approve courses or use courses approved by the cabinet.  Completion of the courses shall be required at the time of initial licensure or certification in the Commonwealth, as required under KRS 214.615 and 214.620 and shall not be required under this section or any other section more frequently than one (1) time every ten (10) years thereafter, unless the licensing board or certifying entity specifically requires more frequent completion under administrative regulations promulgated in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A.

 

 

 

 

PRACTICAL EXERCISES TO BE USED WITH HIV TRAINING

 

1.)      Assemble the appropriate attire to wear when treating someone that is bleeding and have someone don the attire in the proper fashion and then remove the attire correctly so as not to expose themselves to blood.

 

2.)      Ask attendees to write items on the board that are most precious to them and then one item at a time take them away as an HIV/AIDS victim would lose these items, such as their job and their health, insurance, family etc.

 

3.)      Ask attendees to talk to each other as patients/care giver in a

           demeaning way that would unacceptable when we are taking care

           of our patients.

           Relate the emotions that are going on with this conversation as to

           how patients feel if you treat them like this when you are the care-

           giver.

 

4.)       If you have phone access in the classroom or near the room, ask an

           attendee to use the phone book to find resources for testing and

           treatment and attempt to call them to see how quickly information

           can be obtained.